That first real conversation between me and the TFT threads went on
well beyond what Ransomnote posted. It’s not any more secret than
the David Chase posts to me that she was so moved by.
Anons may find the rest of the TFT thread story interesting.
You might think that I wound up unwelcome there, but you might not be right about that.
It began when their thread leader pinged me to the end of their previous thread,
here: https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4171950/posts?page=8569#8569
Then it continued into their next thread here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4179320/posts?page=12#12
Things became more interesting here, when the TFT thread leader brought
another of my Q thread posts over to the TFT threads here:
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4179320/posts?page=311#311
Link to all my posts:
https://freerepublic.com/tag/by:easyst/index?tab=comments;brevity=full;options=no-change
~Easy
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/01/2023 Vol.472, Q Day 2135, EasySt wrote: Excerpt:
It’s not any more secret than
the David Chase posts to me that she was so moved by.
You made that up. When you previously insisted that I shouldn't believe his comments about you, I wondered 'Wut'? and "Does Easy think I follow him around and know all his interactions outside the thread???"
You don't follow my interactions with him or else you'd know he and I don't get along either. You're insisting that I was unduly influenced by someone I have pointedly refuted; can you see how annoying that might be to me?
I just checked and you have at least two separate long lamentation posts about this back in *sigh* the September 2022 Q thread *sigh*....so this whining has been going on for at least a YEAR?!
"Official Jim Robinson responses have been limited to “HG isn’t a Mod and Doesn’t Make the Rules” and David Chase isn’t a Mod and isn’t an insider."
and
"You obviously fully bought into Chase’s version of me, of course. I was mistaken to trust you to see through that."
"Since you bought Chase’s version of me, and I’m hurt, any attempt at persuasion is going to seem another manipulative insult."
And there's two more in an email you sent me. Oh why make up my supposed belief in someone I don't follow and don't get along with? Is it because I didn't address, line by line, your innuendos/accusations? Ain't nobody got time for that - it would just chew up so much thread to combat all your insinuations.
This is exactly what you did before - you posted that you were going to stop and in those posts you piled on more!
Please stop.
STOP! STOP IT! STOP INCLUDING ME IN YOUR SNEERS AND LAMENTATIONS!
Excerpt of EasySt's post:
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 09/01/2023 Vol.472, Q Day 2135, EasySt wrote: That first real conversation between me and the TFT threads went on
well beyond what Ransomnote posted.
~Easy
Indeed it did. It really did.
When you were linking your posts on the TFT, you failed to post the link to your complaint about the Q threads. You know, your belief about "Concerted efforts to target specific anons that demonstrate capacity to make people think."
You just happened to overlook that post wherein you stir it up on a peaceful, collaborative thread with the same criticism of people on the Q thread you've posted again and again on our thread. You really know how to stir it up on FR; I'll give you that. I can't think of anyone who can disrupt with frequent, voluminous 'victim' status posts as well as you can.
In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled A Weekly Dose of President Trump - Trump Family Train September 1, 2023/October 31, 2023, EasySt wrote: “Perhaps some USED TO BE anons but are not allowed on the Q thread anymore.”
~~~~~~~
^Truth^
And that is one of *my* beefs.
Concerted efforts to target specific anons that demonstrate capacity to make people think.
(Some of the players find that kind of anon to be by far the most intolorable.)Do not doubt that it IS a battle space, with lots of “sides” and agendas packed together.
~Easy