Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: Miami Rebel
“Guiliani admitted the facts before the court are not contested” ... He shouldn’t have.

Think again. Think appeal on new evidence. Think death penalty for election interference applied to a judge.

42 posted on 08/31/2023 2:04:27 PM PDT by RideForever (Damn, another dangling par .....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 41 | View Replies ]


To: RideForever

There is no such thing as “appeal on new evidence.” And there was no reason for Giuliani to have not challenged the claim that Freeman and daughter were not committing election fraud.


43 posted on 09/01/2023 6:46:31 AM PDT by Miami Rebel
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 42 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson