I wish. I tried and see no difference. I have done some work on it myself however.
This is what ChatGPT does to 2,300+ words of mine, as if everything must conform to smartphone brevity, and with zero actual source substantiation (it ignores links), thus rendering it as mere opinion, and fairly useless in debate:
Why Are Many Conservatives Concerned About “Cancel Culture”?
Daniel Hamilton, an evangelical dedicated to helping others as God has helped me.
Updated on Wednesday [Please note that this page is now censored on Quora, and numbered source links are inactive due to the page being defunct. Refer to the footnotes for source attribution. Additional editions post Quora deletion are located at the end of the main document. Visit the main website home page here, by God’s grace.]
The concerns surrounding “cancel culture” among conservatives stem from its basis in political correctness, its widespread adoption, and the differing perceptions of right and wrong between conservative and liberal viewpoints.
Although instances of racism have been present among conservatives in the past, it’s important to note that two wrongs do not make a right. The issue lies in the fact that what is considered morally correct from a Biblical perspective is often criticized by the Left today, while behaviors that are morally objectionable receive sanction. This trend of politically correct overreach, oversensitivity, and pervasiveness is becoming increasingly alarming.
Censorship Trends
One facet of this trend is the rise of censorship. While censorship exists to varying degrees in all cultures, it is concerning that many liberals, rather than relying on established systems of jurisprudence and traditional moral values, are using secretive bureaucracies to make judgments about perceived offenses. This can result in stifling free expression.
Manipulation for Power
It is important to note that many instances of cancel culture are not driven by a genuine concern for combating racism or injustice. Instead, they often serve as tools for liberals to gain and maintain power by presenting themselves as champions of the oppressed. In doing so, they magnify legitimate injustices while also inventing moral offenses. This practice distracts from their own immoral actions and behavior.
Targeting and Censorship
In various arenas such as colleges, corporations, media outlets, and liberal governments, there is a growing tendency to target and censor those who oppose the prevailing liberal ideology. This includes instances like forcing the resignation of individuals who support conservative causes or punishing business owners for adhering to their faith-based beliefs.
Overreacting to Language
Even in cases where someone unintentionally uses politically incorrect language, the cancel culture response can be triggered. For example, educators have been punished for inadvertently causing offense, as seen in a professor’s removal for using a Mandarin word that sounded similar to a racial slur. This hypersensitivity extends to situations like asking innocuous questions about a person’s origin.
Encroachment on Freedom
This tendency to overreact leads to a culture of “canceling” individuals. Examples include Amazon removing books from its platform, corporations censoring conservative viewpoints, and restrictions on free speech. The result is a narrowing of acceptable discourse and an encroachment on personal freedoms.
Balancing Discourse
Despite the genuine need to address societal issues, the liberal approach often ends up promoting censorship and stifling opposing perspectives. This has culminated in actions like removing classic literature, banning certain terms, and even influencing the conversation around gender and identity.
In conclusion, the conservative concerns about cancel culture are rooted in the erosion of traditional values, the stifling of free expression, and the manipulation of societal issues for political gain. As debates surrounding censorship, ideological conformity, and personal freedoms continue, it’s essential to strike a balance between addressing genuine concerns and upholding the principles of open discourse.