Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nickcarraway

I could be wrong, but I think Fukishima could release all the water at once and it’s effect on the ocean would be negligible.


2 posted on 08/22/2023 5:02:20 PM PDT by Jonty30 (If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

Not in the immediate area it wouldn’t be. I think their plan sounds very reasonable.


5 posted on 08/22/2023 5:09:01 PM PDT by for-q-clinton (Cancel Culture IS fascism...Let's start calling it that!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

A million tons of water in the Pacific Ocean is a rounding error.


12 posted on 08/22/2023 6:29:42 PM PDT by hinckley buzzard ( Resist the narrative.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

The solution is simple.

Pump the contaminated water into an oil tanker. Pull up to a drilling ship used for oil exploration. Transfer the water to the drill ship and have it released on the abyssal plain of the Pacific which is about 17000 feet. The incredible slow turn over of deep waters to the surface will insure that all the radioactive elements will be harmless when they reach the surface 1000s of years later.


16 posted on 08/22/2023 9:41:34 PM PDT by cpdiii (cane cutter-deckhand-roughneck-geologist- instructor pilot-almost chemist-pharmacist-retired.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

To: Jonty30

The death rates will tell if true.


20 posted on 08/23/2023 8:13:38 AM PDT by Vaduz (....)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson