Replies

A story from an employee.

Well, my uncle’s best friend’s sister also had a story.

The thing is, anyone can make up a story to advance any narrative. The author of this blog did not include any references that verify the claims in the story and he probably does not expect anyone in his target audience to check the references.

He gave a link to the nursing home where all of these vaccine deaths allegedly occurred. Of course, this link is only trying to convince people to consider this nursing home rather than some other facility.

He gave a link to “Medicare Nursing Home Data.” On the very first page of this website, it shows the vaccination rate of all nursing home residents, as well as how many residents and staff caught Covid and how many residents died from it. What it does not show are any deaths caused by vaccines. That’s because deaths associated with vaccines—not caused by but just happening within a certain time period after receiving a vaccine—are extremely rare, one death per hundreds of thousands vaccine recipients. As for deaths caused by vaccines—the overall population level death rate of vaccine recipients is LOWER than expected for a population that size. This makes sense, since Covid vaccines do decrease the severity of disease if someone has a breakthrough case.

In addition to the lack of any verifiable deaths due to Covid vaccination, the CDC data only shows that the chance of catching Covid is decreased after vaccination, and the chance of ending up in the hospital or dying is significantly reduced.

How about let’s being a little skeptical of antivax stories that cannot be verified? It is obvious that those who create antivax propaganda have a goal. They want more people to die from infectious diseases. Don’t give them the satisfaction of being one of those people.

https://data.cms.gov/covid-19/covid-19-nursing-home-data

https://covid.cdc.gov/covid-data-tracker/#datatracker-home

"That’s because deaths associated with vaccines—not caused by but just happening within a certain time period after receiving a vaccine—are extremely rare, one death per hundreds of thousands vaccine recipients. As for deaths caused by vaccines—the overall population level death rate of vaccine recipients is LOWER than expected for a population that size. This makes sense, since Covid vaccines do decrease the severity of disease if someone has a breakthrough case."
ransomnote: Your statements contradict the facts to such a degree I wouldn't even know where to start. For you to maintain this contrary-to-reality position in spite of all the content surfacing in the news indicates nothing I write would matter. You would just repeat the same, as you must have been doing since the vax rolled out. It's like someone opened a time-capsule and you popped out relaying Fauci's false assertions.
"How about let’s being a little skeptical of antivax stories that cannot be verified?"
I've watched vax apologists accept obvious fraud and lies on the part of the medical regime without blinking. NOTHING Fauci, the CDC, NIH etc. ever concerns them or prompts them to be 'skeptical' or fact check, not even 'asymptomatic sick people' or the unprovable assertion that people would have been sicker if they had not been vaxxed. The hypocrisy behind the double standard is breathtaking.
It is obvious that those who create antivax propaganda have a goal. They want more people to die from infectious diseases. Don’t give them the satisfaction of being one of those people.
Steve Kirsch is vaxxed so you can trust his agenda. Covid is and always was highly survivable and no vaccine was ever needed, nor ventillators/midazolam/remdesivir.
Ivermectin works well (where was your 'skepticism' when the CDC denied it and withheld it from the public?).
The problem is pro-EUA-vax fear mongering and denials to push, if not stampede, people into blind acceptance of an unneeded experimental 'shot' based on failed technology and assessed with a invalid PCR 'test' illegally forced upon an unwilling public.