Posted on 08/21/2023 4:21:52 AM PDT by ganeemead
You are the one having it both ways. Statement against interest works like this. I claim I didn't rob a bank and give an alibi. Then I make a statement that shows that my alibi is false. My statement is now admissible evidence that I committed the crime. Same idea with the NY times. I am not relying on the NY Times for proof. I am relying on the fact that after a couple of years of being a propogandist for your side they admitted things aren't going so well.
It's evidence that whatever you warmongering fools are up to you are a bunch of liars. That's all. That's enough.
Citing nyt on the forum works like this:
You credit the nyt.
I don’t read the nyt. I have no idea what they are reporting about.
But you know and you care... when it suits you.
Celebrate your interests, don’t squirm about it.
Irrelevant.
I am over the target because the word count of your replies is excessive. You lose.That weirdness is the best you have to defend your warmongering. You lost at birth.
Relevant when your whole point is trying to stick what your beloved nyt published on me.
Sorry, but evidence wise it isn’t the least bit relevant.
My warmongering? Are you kidding me? I want American to get out of all of its foreign wars and then to take care of itself. I am all for letting the ankle-biting Germans, Russians, Poles, British to sink or swim on their own.
Evidence wise about what?
Oh yea... The nyt you are crediting.
Are you a nyt salesman?
No, badly confused person.
You were actually moaning about Germany not being a good war ally.
Like a Nazi warmonger.
Nein, arsch mit ohren. I'm just saying that Germany really isn't in this war against Russia as it is a vassal country just trying to muddle its way through the useless Ukraine War.
Yup, that same Russian oil and gas that is, thanks to Biden's idiotic and self-defeating sanctions, now powering the economies of our chief rivals in the world, China followed by India.
Oh really?
So the Rand research position on “Overextending and Unbalancing Russia” is unstated and unsubstantiated to you ?
Perhaps you should give a really big tug and pull your head out.
(now go hide under teacher’s skirt)
Well, if you don't know who RAND is and what they do and this is exactly what they do, and who in the gubmint it goes to and who pays for it and why, you are a fool. When RAND writes a report like that and then the US executes that plan there is no conspiracy theory about it. A policy option was present and it was taken.
What exactly are you stupidly trying to say that was not already obvious ?
I am addressing this to Berlin_Freeper who seems to be rather obtuse about this whole Ukies are about to push the Russians off the planet sort of nonsense.
It’s not like we’d come out of that the winners.
You posted this:
Perverse denial in the face of incontrovertible evidence.so let me help you with an actual link:
Neither Ukraine nor Russia to achieve absolute victory in this war RANDWhich supports what I posted about Putin being weak.
(Strike two for you)
Speaking of links (see prior post 97) how about you finally post a link to your credible nyt so I can finally see what you are squawking about?
You know, since you are the one running to the nyt and not me.
Nice stupid, as per your usual, misdirection.
The original post was about a 2019 RAND article which clearly shames you.
(now go stick your head up the teachers skirt)
I am addressing this to Berlin_Freeper who seems to be rather obtuse about this whole Ukies are about to push the Russians off the planet sort of nonsense.The only fool here is you who pushes the nyt as credible (but too stupid to provide a link) and inventing childish bs about pushing Russians off the planet. Is there an adult there that I can post with? Preferably a patriotic Conservative.
Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.