What we need are global mandates for a consistent and non-varying wind speed and elimination of clouds.
When our power goes out, how will we hear of all the wonderful green energy stories?…
Arson isn’t climate change.
Read later.
Green Energy is real when U-Haul announces that their entire fleet nationwide is all EV. Until then, the infrastructure does not exist to go EV.
I’ll take “Or Not” for $500.
.
Every small state should build at least one nuclear power plant. Bigger states two or three. California, Texas, Florida, New York, Illinois and Pennsylvania should build five. States with cities in the top 25 largest cities, should have more dedicated to that city.
green energy = scam
When you are "on the grid", you involuntarily participate in a government controlled and sanctioned, regional monopoly.
Even nuclear powered generation requires round-the-support lock security, as well as half-life spent fuel disposal.
Renewables support the CHiCom "Military/Industrial complex with their increased monopoly over rare earth elements necessary for electrical production and energy storage.
When you rely on mis-named "fossil fuels", you get to choose which supply company that you wish to support.
We are quick to forget last years Texas experience when they had the "Texas Frooze to Death", 8 - 10 day power outage during unseasonable, extreme cold temps,
or the Cheektowaga/Buffalo area snow blizzard where people froze to death while people who had natural gas heating survived.
Human survival requires both energy supply systems to exist, simultaneously.
If you look at yhe numbers 40% of the renewables or 3% of the total are burned to generate power. If the goal is CO2 reduction, they should not be in the “Net Zero” calculation.
It is very doubtful that these renewables produce less CO2 per unit of energy than natural gas, of which we have an abundance. Renewable fuels are pointless as ways to reduce CO2.
So the real number for combustible fuels used to generate power is 82%, and if cost was the only method of selection, these green fuels would be sharply reduced.
The economics for power generation favor natural gas, which is why the environmentalists resist every gas pipeline proposal.
NOT!,,,,,Let the Capitalistic System determine supply and demand of Green Energy.
at odark 30 am.Green Energy = As Real As Utopia
If the government is going to ban the sale of gas boilers in 2035, as it says, it will need to make sure that cheaper alternatives are available. Likewise with a planned ban on new gas and diesel cars: It’s a fine goal, but it won’t go anywhere unless consumers have compelling incentives, charging infrastructure can meet demand and the government has otherwise laid the needed groundwork. . . . Above all, what’s needed is leadership. Decarbonization can drive economic growth, create jobs and bring substantial benefits to the environment and public health. But it must be done purposefully and strategically.
ping