Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel
Usually, if something is more profitable, the private sector would be doing it. I don't see a slew of permit applications being filed to build thorium reactors, and being denied, or approved for that matter.

While the technology is potentially attractive, there's a fairly high startup cost associated with being an early adopter. Just to pick on one item, for example, fabricated thorium fuel elements are probably extremely expensive today, because there's no market for them. (Not much of a market for thorium, period, since they stopped putting it into lantern mantles.)

Now, if you had an already-functioning thorium energy industry, might those thorium fuel elements end up being cheaper than uranium? Yes! But that's a potential savings, not a real one, as of today.

If you want a really mind-blowing tech fantasy, think ... nuclear-powered spacecraft, fueled by thorium, mined from the moon. That's right, based on surveys from orbit, there's believed to be a thorium deposit on the far side of the moon that is something like 3x richer than any thorium ore found on earth.

27 posted on 08/16/2023 2:08:49 PM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 15 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

I agree that the private sector would build it, except...for all the overhead placed on it by government.

Which is likely why you don’t see permit applications being filed. (I have no insight at all into that process, so I would take your word for it)


28 posted on 08/16/2023 2:28:48 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 27 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson