Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: rlmorel

Well, the other problem is that uranium is still fairly cheap, so there’s not much economic incentive to go explore relatively uncharted technological waters.


11 posted on 08/16/2023 11:05:45 AM PDT by Campion (Everything is a grace, everything is the direct effect of our Father's love - Little Flower)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies ]


To: Campion

Not sure that is it, because Thorium is FAR cheaper and easier to mine.


12 posted on 08/16/2023 11:29:16 AM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

To: Campion

I see what you are saying, but the point is, the cost of overall energy generation is only one benefit.

Things to consider:

Safety: FAR safer
Cost of running: Far less labor intensive
Cost of obtaining Thorium: FAR cheaper and more available for Thorium (which would bring the cost of generation down even further)

I honestly believe there are entities that simply do not want cheap energy. If energy is cheap, manufacturing is going to be cheaper, and more consumer activity will take place.

The Greenies hate industry.


15 posted on 08/16/2023 12:02:22 PM PDT by rlmorel ("If you think tough men are dangerous, just wait until you see what weak men are capable of." JBP)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson