I read that article early the headline and assumptions it makes are very misleading, what priority access to the cell network means is in the event of another 9/11 or similar emergency the government access to the cellular network would have priority over everyone else, which most people would not have a problem with.
The is no evidence they can change ballot’s using this system
Think about for one second, in places like Florida where I live we have 67 counties and Duval my county has dozens of precincts, to have access to voting machines assuming this network was used means any voting machine accessed would need a cellular modem otherwise the network access is meaningless, then assuming the machines had cellular modems the government would need access credentials for literally any 10s of thousands of machines
The entire premise of this article is misleading at best
Wrong. There is evidence, but because you didn't read the article you have no clue or basis to make that statement. Go back and read about the DOJ agreement to allow AT&T to sequester all methods and results as proprietary material not to be made public.