Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: nascarnation

For a couple of decades the biggest inspiration was hints of the Los Angeles Bengals, Los Angeles Vikings, Los Angeles (full in name of team that wants to shake down the local taxpayers for a stadium). Just by not having a team in LA the NFL got quite a few stadiums. I’m surprised the ever let a team move in because the threat was far more profitable than actual teams. The Portland ____ wasn’t quite as scary. At the time, Portland was the second largest city without a nearby team. Now St. Louis is the biggest.


16 posted on 08/09/2023 5:54:47 PM PDT by KarlInOhio (Democrats' version of MAGA: Making America the Gulag Archipelago )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: KarlInOhio
Now St. Louis is the biggest.

Yeah but St. Louis is a $hithole. Salt Lake City. If California had their act together, Sacramento could be a contender. Same deal with Portland for that reason.

Right now you could build in the suburbs of St. Louis. Or anywhere in Salt Lake City.

18 posted on 08/09/2023 6:03:51 PM PDT by MinorityRepublican
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

To: KarlInOhio
The Colts here in Indy played the "Los Angeles" card quite often.

I believe they have the most lucrative stadium deal in the NFL. Even when there's a high school football game there, the Irsays get the money.

39 posted on 08/10/2023 9:14:21 AM PDT by nascarnation (Let's go Brandon!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 16 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson