[ProgressingAmerica #135] Massachusetts' legislature was considering abolition as early as 1768 IIRC until it got vetoed by their royal creature Hutchinson.[Woodpusher #137] And your memory appears to serve you
serves youill. American-born Hutchinson was not the Governor in 1768.[ProgressingAmerica #138] The kicker is, you don't even deny that the king's creature Governor Hutchinson did the dirty deed!!!
To clarify, you do not remember correctly. Hutchison was not Governor in 1768 and did not do the dirty deed as you claim to recall. You are simply uninformed or misinformed.
In any case, the alleged dirty deed of 1768, which Hutchinson did not do, would not have been a dirty deed but the act of a British Colonial Governor, appointed to his position to carry out the Royal will, doing his duty.
You try to remember,
Your brain's in a blender,
Like Jello!
Governor Bernard also did the same thing.
https://www.jstor.org/stable/43285055
https://americansystemnow.com/guess-who-insisted-on-slavery-in-colonial-america/
https://www.masshist.org/database/viewer.php?item_id=585&img_step=1&mode=transcript#page1
This is what I mean about your steep anti-Americanism. You could simply go look these things up.
You absolutely do not want to go look these things up. That is because you hate America and you are loyal to a foreign power. You will never, under any circumstances, pursue any action which might lead to a smidge, just a smidge, of a benefit of the doubt for the U.S. under the guise that the U.S. might have actually gotten it right. But you have benefit of the doubt by the gallon for anybody else. You have benefit of the doubt by the truck load, for everybody else.
You choose not, you choose not to give any benefit of the doubt whatever to the U.S. That's not what you are here for. You are in bed with the New York Times.