Chris made a naive assumption ... But he never tested them by using any Biblical discernment or demanding that they prove their provenance vis-a-vis God and the Name of Jesus.
—
It is your assumption that he made an assumption. Which you classify as naive. Is it?
Demanding that a experience believed from God show proof of the same - is beyond idiotic.
There is no denying the simultaneous correspondence between the EEG and the actual phenomenon - which you never watched since it was in the 2nd half of the episode.
Why is it necessary to invoke the name of Jesus? Millions of people in the Christian faith do not always invoke Jesus - many invoke the Lady (Mary).
That's why I tried to establish a common Biblical ground before discussing this matter with you.
End of discussion from me.