[Boogieman]

LOL, just because he doesn’t agree with you 100% doesn’t mean he is “for sale”.

I mean, maybe he is, but that’s just not a good argument. The man’s got more “FU money” than almost anyone else in the media, which makes a very good argument that he’s (at least potentially) one of the least “for sale” people in the country.

[chajin]

The man’s got more “FU money” than almost anyone else in the media

"That's a nice bank account you got there. Be a shame if anything happened to it..."

[jeffersondem]

“LOL, just because he doesn’t agree with you 100% doesn’t mean he is “for sale”.”

There are other explanations than just “for sale.”

Demon possession, for example.

[9YearLurker]

Just how do you think he got that “FU” money—and do you expect him to go against that now?

[rhinohunter]

The man’s got more “FU money” than almost anyone else in the media, which makes a very good argument that he’s (at least potentially) one of the least “for sale” people in the country.

Just because you have lots of "FU money" doesn't in any way imply that you wouldn't go out of your way to acquire even more "FU money". (see Biden, Joseph Robinette).