The thing is though, complaining about Global Homoginization is the furthest thing from Nazism. It was the Nazi's who wanted to put the whole world under a single, superior Aryan Reich. People complaining about GloboHomo would like Thai's to be able to hold on to their Thai-ness, Texans to be able to hold on to their Texas-ness, and even the French to be able to hold on to their French-ness. So, it's acutually a critique of totalitarianism, not an argument in support of it.The thing is though, complaining about Global Homoginization is the furthest thing from Nazism. It was the Nazi's who wanted to put the whole world under a single, superior Aryan Reich. People complaining about GloboHomo would like Thai's to be able to hold on to their Thai-ness, Texans to be able to hold on to their Texas-ness, and even the French to be able to hold on to their French-ness. So, it's acutually a critique of totalitarianism, not an argument in support of it.That is debatable to say the least. Nazis were very big on racial purity and ethnic separatism and very much against "race mixing." A world with master races and subject races is not a homogeneous world.
Plus, I don't think other people using the word GloboHomo think it means what you say it means.
“Plus, I don’t think other people using the word GloboHomo think it means what you say it means.”
Totally agree. I tried to point out the term GloboHomo is typically used inappropriately on FR.
Guess he didn’t appreciate.