Boeing 747 CRASHES Just After Takeoff In New York (with real audio) [TWA800]

Youtube ^ | 7/25/2023 | the last mayday

[logi_cal869]

Note: I discovered rather quickly that this video is a new simulation of the TWA800 disaster, but that is obviously NOT how it is presented.

The following is how this video is presented by the YT publisher, 'the last mayday':

Normally, the average flight from New York to Rome takes 8 hours and 24 minutes. Emphasizing 'normally.' However, during the horror flight of TWA 800, this was anything but normal. Just fifteen minutes after takeoff, the pilot received a distressing message:

"Look at that crazy fuel flow indication on number four."

What is going on here? Stay tuned!

A Boeing 747-100, carrying 230 passengers and crew, was preparing for a scheduled international passenger flight from John F. Kennedy International Airport (JFK), New York, to Charles DeGaulle International Airport (CDG), Paris, France.

Join us on this gripping journey as we uncover the tragic events that unfolded during TWA Flight 800. Explore the background of the aircraft and its experienced crew, the technical issues that led to the delay, and the pivotal moment when the air conditioning unknowingly triggered a catastrophe.

Discover how a series of seemingly ordinary radio transmissions were the last communication from TWA 800. Uncover the critical factors that turned the fuel tank into a deadly bomb, leading to a devastating disaster.

[Rappini]

They are still trying to cover this up by saying it was the fuel tank when it was a missile. Remember Klinton was up for election when this happened.

[DiogenesLamp]

This would not surprise me. I disagree with Cashill where he concludes that it was a rogue USA missile.

I have exchanged emails with Cashill and I told him that he was wrong about that, and I had a source. He asked if he could contact that source and I told him I would ask my source. I did, and my source wants no part of any inquiry. It may be a good part of a book for Jack Cashill, but for my friend it could mean prison and/or the loss of income.

Again, just describing the evidence would be enough to identify my source.

Somewhat related, I had an aeronautical engineer friend who said the ‘official’ explanation that a center fuel tank explosion was total BS.

It *IS* total BS, and you don't have to be a rocket scientist to understand that. Some years back I got into an argument with a guy pushing the "center fuel tank" theory, and he linked me to a study that showed jet fuel can be ignited by an ignition source.

I read the study. It was using crazy high levels of power to get jet fuel to ignite. I pointed out that the circuitry of the center fuel tank had no source of power sufficient to reach the temperatures required.

Couldn't be done.

This is Bill Clinton, ordering everybody to lie to the nation.

[sport]

That is also the opinion of Jack Cashill. The question is whose missile?

Donald Trump's? That is one of the few things that he hasn't been blamed for.

[PLMerite]

“747 trivia question: why is there a bulge in the upper nose of the 747?”

Isn’t that where the disco was supposed to be ?

[cymbeline]

“why is there a bulge in the upper nose of the 747? ... Isn’t that where the disco was supposed to be ?”

Good try but the bulge is there because it contains a hinge so the front of the plane can be swung open for loading freight. Of course the back can also be opened. The other jumbos don’t have the ability to open both ends.