Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

As Michigan Charges Trump Electors With Felonies, Recall How Leftists Everywhere Urged 2016 Electors To Defect To Hillary
The Federalist ^ | 07/19/2023 | Jordan Boyd

Posted on 07/19/2023 5:46:28 PM PDT by simpson96

If the last two election cycles have proven anything, it’s that Democrats hold an undeniable double standard when it comes to objecting to elections.

The radically different treatment Republicans receive when contesting poorly administered elections intensified this week when Michigan Attorney General Dana Nessel charged 16 Republican electors in her state for participating in what she deemed a “false electors scheme.” Defendants, all 55 years or older, each face eight various conspiracy and forgery felony counts that carry a sentence of five to 14 years in prison each.

“The evidence will demonstrate there was no legal authority for the false electors to purport to act as ‘duly elected presidential electors’ and execute the false electoral documents,” Nessel, an avid anti-“election denier” activist, said in a statement. “Every serious challenge to the election had been denied, dismissed, or otherwise rejected by the time the false electors convened.”

The corporate media hailed Nessel’s allegations as a “righteous prosecution” and “compelling.” History, however, shows the charges are nothing more than a political ploy to advance the left’s war on anyone who questions election results or seeks solutions to preserve election integrity.

In fact, attacks on the Trump electors in Michigan, a state where election fraud was reported in both 2020 and 2022, come from the same party and its institutional allies that formally objected to every GOP presidential certification this century and shamelessly attempted to turn electors against their political enemy Trump in 2016.

Sanctimonious Scrambling

As soon as it was clear that Donald Trump, despite the deep state’s best efforts to hoax him out of the running, would become the 45th president of the United States, Democrats and their allies scrambled to influence electors to reject Americans’ wishes.

Corporate media quickly rose to the top as the loudest voice calling for electoral disobedience. Articles demanding state electors “prevent an irresponsible demagogue from taking office” and overrule Americans to install Hillary Clinton as president popped up in the pages of The Atlantic, The Washington Post, the Daily Beast, Vox, and Time.

The New York Times even published an article from a Texas-based Republican elector explaining “Why I Will Not Cast My Electoral Vote for Donald Trump.”

“The Electoral College is essentially an undemocratic system that’s been jury-rigged to make it somewhat more democratic,” another Vox article asserted to reassure any skeptics.

These last-ditch attempts to keep Trump out of the White House were eagerly amplified by people like MSNBC’s Joy Reid and NYT’s Jonathan Weisman, in tweets collated by journalist Michael Tracey.

Propaganda press puppets such as MSNBC’s Chris Hayes, WaPo’s EJ Dionne, and NYT’s Paul Krugman added their two cents about why electors should act on their open disdain for a Trump presidency on Twitter and on TV.

Jennifer Palmieri, the communications director for the Hillary Clinton 2016 presidential campaign who later bragged about her role in meddling with the 2016 election by spreading the Russia collusion hoax, also joined in on the dogpile.

Clinton’s top political adviser John Podesta urged a foreign intervention intelligence briefing for electors prior to their vote, hoping that news about Russia would fuel the campaign’s efforts to question the legitimacy of Trump’s victory.

Petitions calling on electors to “Make Hillary Clinton President” made their rounds on the internet. These were promoted by celebrities such as singer Pink and their sentiments echoed by movie star Mark Ruffalo.

Video ads of celebrities pleading and pressuring electors to “prevent an unfit candidate from becoming president” by voting against Trump also circulated.

“You have position, the authority, and the opportunity to go down in the books as an American hero who changed the course of history,” the activists claimed in one “Unite For America” campaign video.

When leftists’ partisan ploy to swindle electors didn’t work, they turned to congressional Democrats to object to Trump’s presidential certification. Multiple Democrats attempted to verbally object to the electoral votes from multiple states until then-Vice President Joe Biden was forced to quiet his colleagues’ ramblings about voting machines and Russia collusion to proceed with formally handing Trump the presidency.

Even after that, prominent Democrats such as former President Jimmy Carter and failed Democrat presidential candidate Hillary Clinton supported the theory that Trump was illegitimately elected. Polls showed 42 percent of Americans thought the same.

No Such Thing As ‘False Electors’

In her charges, Nessel repeatedly painted the Michigan defendants as “false elector” co-conspirators who participated in a “desperate effort” to “interfere with and overturn our free and fair election process, and along with it, the will of millions of Michigan voters.” Legally, however, there’s no such thing as “false electors.”

“There were contingent Republican electors named consistent with legal precedent to preserve the still ongoing legal challenges to the validity of Georgia’s certified vote,” my colleague Margot Cleveland explained in May when corporate media tried to smear Republican electors in the Peach State.

A similar elector swap to those in Michigan and Georgia happened in Hawaii in 1960. As Cleveland pointed out, it received praise instead of scrutiny because Democrats and their preferred candidate came out on top.

After Richard Nixon was initially declared the victor in Hawaii in 1960, both Nixon’s and John F. Kennedy’s electors decided to meet and “cast their votes for President and Vice President, and certified their own meeting and votes.” The three Hawaii electors, all Democrats, cast their votes for Kennedy.

When state circuit court Judge Ronald Jamieson eventually ruled Kennedy the winner of the presidency, Cleveland said he “stressed the importance of the Democrat electors having met on Dec. 19, as prescribed by the Electoral Count Act, to cast their ballots in favor of Kennedy.”

“That step allowed the Hawaii governor to then certify Kennedy as the winner of Hawaii’s three electoral votes and, in turn, Congress to count Hawaii’s electoral votes in favor of Kennedy,” she continued.

The stark difference between how Democrats and Republicans are treated on the elector issue merely confirms Americans’ worst fears about the nation’s two-tiered system of justice.

More Democrats denied that former President Donald Trump won the 2016 election than the people who claimed President Joe Biden wasn’t legitimately elected in 2020 — but it’s Republicans who face jail time for expressing concern.

If you’re a loyal leftist partisan harping on voting machines and Russian “hacking,” objecting to every GOP victory, and demanding electors vote against the will of the people, you’re a hero and protector of democracy. If you do the same to the benefit of a Republican candidate, you’ve fomented a “coup attempt” and betrayed the soul of the nation.

At a time when the justice system is weaponized against Trump and his followers, that’s a damning double standard that not even the most corrupt, partisan actors can ignore.


TOPICS: Chit/Chat
KEYWORDS: 1984; falseelectors
Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

1 posted on 07/19/2023 5:46:28 PM PDT by simpson96
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Very perceptive.


2 posted on 07/19/2023 5:47:34 PM PDT by No name given (Anonymous is who you’ll know me as)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

Face it it’s one party rule and you can’t question the democrats


3 posted on 07/19/2023 5:49:46 PM PDT by butlerweave
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: GOPJ; 2nd amendment mama; 4everontheRight; ADemocratNoMore; afraidfortherepublic; Aliska; ...

p


4 posted on 07/19/2023 5:55:07 PM PDT by Liz (Vox Populi, Vox Dei (voice of the people is the voice of God))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
Michigan is gone.

It's going to out-california California within five years, under the iron fist and stiletto heels of the Michigan Demon Girls.

And there's a good chance that "Nazi" Nessel is a case of demonic possession.

5 posted on 07/19/2023 5:55:14 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil

Michigan is gone? The whole GD country is gone.


6 posted on 07/19/2023 5:56:05 PM PDT by workerbee (==)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: No name given
There was election fraud in Michigan in 2018, which is how the state fell into the hands of the Democrazis.

The spineless RINOs didn't push back, and now here we are.

7 posted on 07/19/2023 5:57:34 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 2 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

AL GORE vs GEORGE W...

Al Gore Wasn’t ‘A Man’ about Losing
https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/al-gore-wasnt-a-man-about-losing/

What Happened to the Democrats Who Never Accepted Bush’s Election
https://www.politico.com/news/magazine/2020/12/19/2004-kerry-election-fraud-2020-448604


8 posted on 07/19/2023 5:58:11 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD. (Psalm 33:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: workerbee

I agree that the whole GD country is gone - but Michigan is on a rocket sled to commie perdition.


9 posted on 07/19/2023 5:58:27 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

VP Harris’ new comms director said George W. Bush ‘stole’ election from Gore, was ‘illegitimate’

https://www.foxnews.com/politics/vp-harris-jamal-simmons-george-w-bush-stole-election


10 posted on 07/19/2023 5:59:18 PM PDT by stars & stripes forever (Blessed is the nation whose GOD is the LORD. (Psalm 33:12))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

No, It’s not fair, but what’s new about the undemocratic party? They give everybody the shaft all the time. The democrat party is the banana republic party.


11 posted on 07/19/2023 6:00:40 PM PDT by virgil (The evil that men do lives after them )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: virgil

Talk about elder abuse ?!


12 posted on 07/19/2023 6:02:53 PM PDT by George from New England
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 11 | View Replies]

To: simpson96
Found this on another site today:

John Podesta, role playing Joe Biden in Transition Integrity Project's summer 2020 simulation to ensure a Biden presidency even if Trump won the election, openly plotted sending a separate elector slate"

And this from December 12, 2016:

Podesta backs bid to overturn electoral vote

Another question I'd like an answer to, is why didn't anyone indict Al Gore back in 2000 for trying to overturn the election in Florida?

13 posted on 07/19/2023 6:06:16 PM PDT by mass55th (“Courage is being scared to death, but saddling up anyway.” ― John Wayne)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: kiryandil
Don't forget:

Whitmer Welcomes World Economic Forum US Centre for Advanced Manufacturing to Michigan

14 posted on 07/19/2023 6:06:23 PM PDT by Tench_Coxe (The woke were surprised by the reaction to the Bud Light fiasco. May there be many more surprises)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 5 | View Replies]

To: Tench_Coxe

Governor Shinyface, WEF wenchlette.


15 posted on 07/19/2023 6:11:16 PM PDT by kiryandil (China Joe and Paycheck Hunter - the Chink in America's defenses)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 14 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

[statute revised since the election]

3 U.S. Code § 5 - Certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors

(a)In General.—
(1)Certification.—
Not later than the date that is 6 days before the time fixed for the meeting of the electors, the executive of each State shall issue a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors, under and in pursuance of the laws of such State providing for such appointment and ascertainment enacted prior to election day.
(2)Form of certificate.—Each certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors shall—
(A)set forth the names of the electors appointed and the canvass or other determination under the laws of such State of the number of votes given or cast for each person for whose appointment any and all votes have been given or cast;
(B)bear the seal of the State; and
(C)contain at least one security feature, as determined by the State, for purposes of verifying the authenticity of such certificate.

(b)Transmission.—It shall be the duty of the executive of each State—
(1)to transmit to the Archivist of the United States, immediately after the issuance of a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors and by the most expeditious method available, such certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors; and
(2)to transmit to the electors of such State, on or before the day on which the electors are required to meet under section 7, six duplicate-originals of the same certificate.

(c)Treatment of Certificate as Conclusive.—For purposes of section 15:
(1)In general.—
(A)Certificate issued by executive.—
Except as provided in subparagraph (B), a certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors issued pursuant to subsection (a)(1) shall be treated as conclusive in Congress with respect to the determination of electors appointed by the State.
(B)Certificates issued pursuant to court orders.—
Any certificate of ascertainment of appointment of electors required to be issued or revised by any State or Federal judicial relief granted prior to the date of the meeting of electors shall replace and supersede any other certificates submitted pursuant to this section.
....
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/3/5

“I, Gretchen E. Whitmer, Governor of the State of Michigan, certify that at the general election held in Michigan on Tuesday, November 3, 2020:

“The following persons nominated by the Democratic Party, each having received 2,804,040 votes, were duly elected as Electors of the President and Vice President of the United States of America:
....
“Votes received by other candidates for the office of Elector of the President and Vice President of the United States of America are as follows:

“The following persons nominated by the Republican Party each received 2,649,852 votes: John Haggard; Kent Vanderwood; Terri Lynn Land; Gerald Wall; Amy Facchinello....”

https://www.archives.gov/files/electoral-college/2020/ascertainment-michigan.pdf


16 posted on 07/19/2023 6:15:16 PM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

This is called lawfare, folks. It is the democrat’s favorite weapon in the ongoing CWII.


17 posted on 07/19/2023 6:19:45 PM PDT by joma89 (Buy weapons and ammo, folks, and have the will to use them.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

“Not only would each certificate he introduced be “regular in form and authentic,” he said at the time, but they would be the ones that “the parliamentarians have advised me is the only certificate of vote from that state, and purports to be a return from the state, and that has annexed to it a certificate from an authority of that state purporting to appoint or ascertain electors.”

“It was a mouthful with a purpose. Pence was incorporating the specific legal language of the Electoral Count Act — the 1887 law that, along with the 12th Amendment, governs the counting of electoral votes. The law requires that any electoral votes counted by Congress be submitted by official state authorities, like governors and secretaries of state.”

https://www.politico.com/news/2022/03/11/pence-jan-6-election-certification-script-00016539


18 posted on 07/19/2023 6:26:16 PM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

https://www.collins.senate.gov/imo/media/doc/one_pager_on_electoral_count_reform_act_of_2022.pdf


19 posted on 07/19/2023 6:34:26 PM PDT by Brian Griffin (ARTICLE I SECTION 2....The President...may require the opinion, in writing)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

To: simpson96

This really upsets me. Ken Thompson is a good man.

They were successful in Georgia doing this. More states are coming.

They are trying to prove that all seven swing states did this under direction from Trump. And offering immunity for turncoats.

See my posting history for the link which explains this...newsweek.

Extremely frightening to live in this country these days.


20 posted on 07/19/2023 6:37:52 PM PDT by MarMema
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]


Navigation: use the links below to view more comments.
first 1-2021-27 next last

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson