Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: DugwayDuke
You're really still pretending the Jim Jones Jab had positive efficacy?

They stopped telling that lie more than a year ago.

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/03/20/vaccine-effectiveness-hits-as-low-as-minus-300-as-ukhsa-announces-it-will-no-longer-publish-the-data/

69 posted on 07/20/2023 5:23:08 AM PDT by T.B. Yoits
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 67 | View Replies ]


To: T.B. Yoits

T.B. Yoits wrote: “You’re really still pretending the Jim Jones Jab had positive efficacy?”

Yes, the COVID vaccines have positive efficacy.
You’re making at least three mistakes if you believe otherwise.
First, the vaccines were far more effictive against the earlier strains which btw were the most deadly. Efficacy has dropped against the later strains which is why there are boosters.
Second, your confusing effacacy and effectiveness.
Third, the study you linked does not take into consideration various biases:

“Since the emergence of the SARS-CoV-2 Omicron variant, multiple observational studies have reported negative vaccine effectiveness (VE) against infection, symptomatic infection, and even severity (hospitalization), potentially leading to an interpretation that vaccines were facilitating infection and disease. However, current observations of negative VE likely stem from the presence of various biases (e.g., exposure differences, testing differences).”

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC10040347/#:~:text=Since%20the%20emergence%20of%20the,were%20facilitating%20infection%20and%20disease.


71 posted on 07/20/2023 8:29:42 AM PDT by DugwayDuke (Most pick the expert who says the things they agree with.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 69 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson