You ask reasonable questions. Here’s what we knew at the time:
1. For almost a full year, nobody could get their hands on the exact genetic sequence of the SARS-COV-2 virus. MIT finally mapped it out as completely as they could in April of 2021, but still admitted that the full sequence eluded them.
2. The labs performing covid tests were using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process, invented by Dr. Kary Mullis in 1983. In recognition of his role in the invention of the PCR technique, Mullis shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year.
3. Prior to his death in 2019, Dr. Mullis reiterated at every opportunity that the PCR process should never be used as a diagnostic tool because it could be manipulated to find anything you wanted to find simply by increasing the number of times the sample was amplified.
4. Reputable labs suggested no more than 26-28 amplifications for covid tests.
5. Government health officials were requiring labs to amplify their samples more than 40 times.
Given the widespread and inappropriate use and abuse of the PCR process to “identify” covid, a virus that had not been fully sequenced even a year later, who knows what they were finding?
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled Q ~ Trust Trump's Plan ~ 07/10/2023 Vol.465, Q Day 2073, LittleLinda wrote: |
You ask reasonable questions. Here’s what we knew at the time: 1. For almost a full year, nobody could get their hands on the exact genetic sequence of the SARS-COV-2 virus. MIT finally mapped it out as completely as they could in April of 2021, but still admitted that the full sequence eluded them. Your answer is correct. But wait! There's MOAR! The normal we've-always-done-it-this-way method of obtaining the authentic virus is to isolate it. Collect samples from a sick person - pull out all known viruses (there's always a stew of viruses around) and test the unknown virus(s) by exposing a person. If the person gets the targeted disease, you know have the virus to use for the creation of drug treatments, tests, vaccines etc. But - in 2020 (probably February), our vaccine makers (the article I remember was Moderna) were delighted to wake up and find that China had released the genome of the Covid virus. They created it through mapping with a computer modeling system. China stated it used this method because IT DID NOT HAVE AN ISOLATED SAMPLE of the virus. How odd! Why wasn't the normal process used? Why wasn't it done in the US or anywhere else in the world and released? If this is a humanity threatening virus - we'd certainly want to isolate it! So the Moderna engineer interviewed (might have been a technology publication) said when he saw China had released it's modeled genome, he 'got right to work' because that's all he needed. So no one in the world was doing a thing until China, which stands accused of having soemthing to do with developing bioweapons in Wuhan, gave the US the map of the virus? Our enemies, supposedly gave us the genetic code? Doing so would not make sense because the ancestry of viruses can be traced and if Wuhan had something to do with it, sharing the genetic code could expose that. Ah but there's a catch. China used a technological method to 'map' the genome that by definition could not accurately render the genetic code. You recall Fauci kept stressing that this 'Covid' virus was a vastly bigger hazard than past influenzas - this could wipe out millions etc. - because he said 'Covid' was classified as a 'novel' virus, which would mean humans had never encountered it before and would simply not mount an immune response, or a sufficient immune response, to infection. Yet China's method uses computer modeling which allows researchers to select segments of existing (identified) viruses from a library as needed to 'patch' in missing pieces. So you can't assemble a 'novel' virus from a pre-exisiting library of segments! So the vaccines are built on what must be a related or otherwise vague corona virus model that China cooked up. The CDC said it did not have the isolated virus, too, so the PCR was developed based on a different corona virus. Pfizer - didn't have the isolated virus either. Throughout the pandemic no one had the genome. Now I didn't know about MIT's version but it may be they still didn't isolate the virus - they used mapping. I suppose Fauci would have said it was too dangerous to expose anyone to the virus to isolate it as is standard procedure. But of course, it was not that dangerous, particularly to younger subjects. Dr. Mikovitz developed the cell line (monkey kidney cells) for researchers at the CDC to use when testing drugs/vaccines etc. She spent a lot of time on this work and still remembers the code on the plates she used (the code for the monkey kidney cells selected for CDC use out from among many developed). Whenever she saw a researcher claiming that they used isolated Covid virus samples, she read through their research, moving through layers of tables etc. which all seemed to say the same thing (the claim that they used isolated samples) until at the innermost layer of arcane information, she'd find that the 'Covid' virus used was in a suspension of that same (by identifiable code) line of monkey kidney cells that she personally developed years ago. She never found any researchers with the authentically isolated Covid virus. So I wonder wut's wut with MIT? If they have the authentic virus then it could be used to identify who engineered it, and would prove that portions of it had been previously patented per Dr. Martin. The fact that the researchers had elaborate analysis of 'Covid' based on the virus in monkey kidney cells makes me wonder if 'Covid' as described to us is actually in the 'vaccine'. Recall that the mRNA technology encloses the virus in a protective pouch so the body can't attack it before it reaches the cells. Well that technology would be needed if you were inserting a monkey virus (or bat virus) into human cells - the human immune system would destroy it otherwise. I dunno 2. The labs performing covid tests were using the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) process, invented by Dr. Kary Mullis in 1983. In recognition of his role in the invention of the PCR technique, Mullis shared the 1993 Nobel Prize in Chemistry with Michael Smith and was awarded the Japan Prize in the same year. I recall seeing a clip of Fauci saying, "Well at 40 x there's nothing but nucleotides left..." (unidentifiable building blocks of a variety of genetic materials) Given the widespread and inappropriate use and abuse of the PCR process to “identify” covid, a virus that had not been fully sequenced even a year later, who knows what they were finding? Late in the game, the CDC admitted it based the PCR 'test' on an influenza virus (corona virus type). Given the mismanagement (intentional) there's really no saying what people were getting or dying from. It's possible there were hard strains of influenza released on purpose that year to make an impression that 'this Covid thing is not like prior influenza's. I still slip and refer to 'Covid' when there's no test for it. Oh I know, Gates and Soros came up with a 'real' test for it. I feel all better now.... /s |
Many thankQs LL !
You
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4166961/posts?page=775#775
and MqD
https://freerepublic.com/focus/chat/4166961/posts?page=800#800
answered my questions !
From what y’all said, once they had the PCR tests, they stopped testing for flu, since popping positive for both would expose the plan in the plandemic.
* * * “Fake” PCR test / no full C-19 virus sequence * * *