So, the first mystery is "why not", the second is the lack of an answer to the first!
IF the wearer has nothing on under the sweatpants, I suppose, er, "abrasion" of a sensitive body part in the vicinity could be an issue. But, even then, these issues are easily and cheaply addressed. Men's sleepwear has a fly and buttons. Etc.
???
1 posted on
07/09/2023 8:27:07 AM PDT by
Paul R.
To: Paul R.
Heading out to church - will check comments later... :-)
2 posted on
07/09/2023 8:27:55 AM PDT by
Paul R.
(You know your pullets are dumb if they don't recognize a half Whopper as food!)
To: Paul R.
3 posted on
07/09/2023 8:30:17 AM PDT by
Alas Babylon!
(Repeal the Patriot Act; Abolish the DHS; reform FBI top to bottom!)
To: Paul R.
In diese Tag sie mussen ein “Sitzpinkler” sein.
5 posted on
07/09/2023 8:36:19 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: Paul R.
I just thought it unnecessary, since they generally have elastic cinch belts, and all you have to do is lower them in front.
To: Paul R.
Zipper no longer required.
9 posted on
07/09/2023 9:00:24 AM PDT by
Libloather
(Why do climate change hoax deniers live in mansions on the beach?)
To: Paul R.
As men get older, they forget to zip their pants. Be appreciative. Zipperless sweatpants are a godsend.
To: Paul R.
Maybe the problem is your hose is too short?
To: Paul R.
What’s the difference between a man on a bicycle wearing a tuxedo and a man on a unicycle wearing sweatpants and a hoodie?
Attire.
13 posted on
07/09/2023 9:23:09 AM PDT by
outofsalt
(If history teaches us anything, it's that history rarely teaches anything.)
To: Paul R.
If the sweat pant elastic is too tight to lower the front to “do your business” then you bought them a size too small.
16 posted on
07/09/2023 12:18:58 PM PDT by
John Milner
(Marching for Peace is like breathing for food.)
To: All
I’m surprised no one has posted this reason yet:
It is much cheaper NOT to. Saves on both labor costs and materials costs.
Even Fetterman should be able to figure that out.
To: Paul R.
Ummm, you just pull the sweats and undies, or sweats forward and let it hang out and go. Who uses or needs a fly?
18 posted on
07/09/2023 2:48:51 PM PDT by
Glad2bnuts
(“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: We should have set up ambushes...paraphrased)
To: Paul R.
Ummm, you just pull the sweats and undies, or sweats forward and let it hang out and go. Who uses or needs a fly?
19 posted on
07/09/2023 2:49:20 PM PDT by
Glad2bnuts
(“And how we burned in the camps later, thinking: We should have set up ambushes...paraphrased)
To: Paul R.
I bought a pair of cheap cargoes without looking at them closely or trying them on.......turns out it has no fly and you have to untie it and drop trou to pee. Whose silly idea was that?
21 posted on
07/09/2023 8:17:04 PM PDT by
Some Fat Guy in L.A.
(Still bitterly clinging to rational thought despite its unfashionability)
To: Paul R.
SO... It occurred to me to do a search for "Why don't men's jogging pants have a zippered fly?" A couple major search engines and a couple minor search platforms turned up nothing useful. Today's search engines seem to assume you want the most popular similar results, despite what you specify.
22 posted on
07/09/2023 8:22:03 PM PDT by
daniel1212
(As a damned+destitute sinner turn 2 the Lord Jesus who saves souls on His acct + b baptized 2 obey)
To: Paul R.
That’s funny. I was wondering the same thing last week.
27 posted on
07/10/2023 12:07:00 AM PDT by
gitmo
(If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
To: Paul R.
I’ll bet the transexuals are going to demand that all men’s clothes be made without a fly because it’s assuming all men have a penis.
29 posted on
07/10/2023 12:33:12 AM PDT by
gitmo
(If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
To: Paul R.
Took me one try to find sweat pants with front zippers on Amazon. Ditto jogging pants.
30 posted on
07/10/2023 4:57:47 AM PDT by
Hootowl
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson