Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ansel12

NATO may have no interest in attacking Russia, and maybe it was a defensive move, but it was still apparently too close for comfort in Russia’s eyes. Shortens the time in which their capital can be obliterated.

As for the second question, are you kidding?

The particulars are not important. The negotiator will soon discover which issues are most important to each side. The two sides have to be pressured into it soon, because things are getting out of control.

China was trying to get them to talk at one point. Also, it came out yesterday that there has been at least one talk between the U.S. national security officials and Lavrov while Lavrov was in town for a meeting of the UN Security Council. So people are trying.


88 posted on 07/07/2023 8:13:17 PM PDT by firebrand
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 64 | View Replies ]


To: firebrand

The second part of that question was valid, and did you notice that Russia didn’t care about Finland joining NATO?

Russia desperately wants and needs Ukraine, it isn’t about NATO proximity.


90 posted on 07/07/2023 8:43:27 PM PDT by ansel12 (NATO warrior under Reagan, and RA under Nixon, bemoaning the pro-Russians from Vietnam to Ukraine.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 88 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson