Was it necessary to include the igger, since it wasn’t in the source article?
“Was it necessary to include the igger, since it wasn’t in the source article?”
IT was in the original article, but the word was truncated, to avoid offense, I am sure. I included the missing letters, in brackets, to show the missing letter were added by me, because it was integral to the Ebonics focus of the post. I did so because as adults, we should be able to read offensive words without having our feelings hurt.