[peteypupperdoo]

I always think of the butterfly effect.

++++++++++++
Is that a good thing or bad thing 👀?

[AFB-XYZ]

RN — if posts from GAW, or regarding the Brunson case, are “no-go” on the Q thread, please have this post deleted. I won’t take offenses.

Anyway, The Brunsons are back. Found on GAW:

https://greatawakening.win/p/16bPnwI0V1/brunson-case-update/

Unless there’s something going on under the radar that the general public doesn’t know about, Loy Brunson is misrepresenting things. Distributing a case for conference is NOT the same as hearing the case. Setting a case for conference merely means that the Supremes will discuss whether to hear the case or not. They denied Case No. 22-380 what, three times? I hope something comes of this one, but I’m not tremendously optimistic.

25 years in the legal profession lets you see a lot of weird stuff. Never heard of anything like the Brunson case succeeding. But, I could be wrong. This is one time where I’d very much LIKE to be wrong. We’ll see.

[Steve Van Doorn]

The butterfly effect: My way at looking at it. A tiny change in the wind from the wings of the butterfly can slightly influence someone else decision or thoughts. That can cascade in to profound effects later on.

Or another way to see it. Don't try to change someones mind because you can't. Though you can influence their thinking.
Which is a good thing.