... the problem though is that 'The Sword in the Stone' was invented by French writers, it's an interesting connection, but it's one that comes up 500 years after the first mentions of Arthur.
>>>
So many people attempt to "find Arthur" by picking and choosing what to consider real, or what to consider fake, despite the fact that all of these stories are fake.
Yeah but life imitates art, like the white stone at the end of the street. It's there, even with official government documentation.
It's facing east, toward a place with an interesting old "Egyptian-Jewish" name. It's got a survey marker that's really been worked over, pried up all around, such that the disk looks more like a circle of Hamantaschen dough starting to be folded inward to form the three sides.
It's been pried up enough to literally hold water (I've seen it after a rain), but it's anchored in. Nobody has been able to pry it up, at least not yet. Wonder what the attraction is, hmmm. Not like it's a tourist attraction; it's just one among several along the way.
It'll take the rightful heir to the Kingdom to lift it out with ease. Good thing I happen to know where it is.
In the center, the name code represents several key Biblical names and places, not to mention that its ID is the same as important elements relating to the whole story.
At this rate, no one ought to be surprised that "Arthur" should turn out to be Irish after all. There is always some kind of gimmick afoot.
Thanks for the topic. I'll have to refresh my memory on the details.