This is a waste of time. You are straining at a gnat and swallowing a camel. You posted information to me questioning where the tape came from, and stating CNN hadn’t heard the tape, and that all they had were “typed words”. I responded to you that the information was included in the indictment and that the CNN article you referenced was out of date. That was the substance of my “claim”, and it is undisputed. If you still want to kvetch over the fact that I specified what the book was about when the indictment didn’t, feel free. It doesn’t change anything and I don’t have time to waste on this anymore. I am always happy to discuss and even argue about issues, but have no patience for someone just wanting to score gotcha points on irrelevant details. If that makes you feel like you’ve won something, good for you - you obviously need something to make you feel better about yourself.
Isn't that all they had?
If you still want to kvetch over the fact that I specified what the book was about when the indictment didn’t, feel free.
You didn't specify what the book was about, you said that a specific book was called out in the indictment when it appears it isn't. That's on you.
You spinning it isn't going to change that.
If that makes you feel like you’ve won something, good for you ...
I wasn't trying to "win" anything. I'm trying to get the truth. It isn't in you, apparently.