The answer to the problem of the Unidentified Flying Object is to identify it. Then we don't have to call it an "object." If there is any tangible and undeniable proof, that should be a piece of cake. Or a squirrel. Look!
I wonder, since the "competing claims" game of the last "pandemic" event has gone by, and the "competing claims" of the Ukie-Ruskie are (present tense) going by, whether this is all just "stoking" the media fires. Rabbit holes, once one chases down them, can occupy a lot of one's time and energy.
This UFO claim is interesting, but it is way too early IMO to reach any conclusions.
You see a lot of concrete thinking (as opposed to abstract thinking) on these UFO threads because the subject matter is so paradigm-busting thinking styles devolve.
If true, everything we previously thought of as reality will be altered in some way. If untrue, then "whew."
You can't blame people for being extremely skeptical because the claims are like nothing ever before experienced on earth (even bigger than Cortes to the Aztecs). Very scary stuff.