Two years of immunotherapy may be perfectly fine for this approach with non-small cell lung cancer.
To: Mazey; ckilmer; goodnesswins; Jane Long; BusterDog; jy8z; ProtectOurFreedom; matthew fuller; ...
The “Take Charge Of Your Health” Ping List
This high volume ping list is for health articles and studies which describe something you or your doctor, when informed, may be able to immediately implement for your benefit.
Email me to get on either the “Common/Top Issues” (20 - 25% fewer pings) or “Everything” list.
2 posted on
06/05/2023 7:55:10 AM PDT by
ConservativeMind
(Trump: Befuddling Democrats, Republicans, and the Media for the benefit of the US and all mankind.)
To: ConservativeMind
I noticed that nowhere in the article do they give an actual life expectancy expressed in number of years.
My wife has been getting immunotherapy for a cancer in her lungs for 3 and 1/2 years now. The doctor told her the clinical trials only went for 2 years. She is in Uncharted Territory, but he said that he will give her the immunotherapy indefinitely as long as it is helping her.
The main concern in the article appears to be the increased cost to the Healthcare System. My main concern is my wife’s increased lifespan.
3 posted on
06/05/2023 8:05:44 AM PDT by
Wasichu
To: ConservativeMind
More of reasoning for limiting medical care for folks that aren’t expected to be around much longer? Maybe we are heding to Canada’s “If your sick, suicide is just another form of medical care”.
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson