To: Diana in Wisconsin
2 posted on
06/04/2023 6:55:58 AM PDT by
ProtectOurFreedom
(I don’t like to think before I say something...I want to be just as surprised as everyone else.)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
3 posted on
06/04/2023 6:59:58 AM PDT by
Bob434
(question )
To: ProtectOurFreedom
Because it will show us that the “aggressive” breeds, such as a Pit Bull, are nowhere on the list. The whole aggressive dog breed thing is a sham.
A couple of years ago, the most bites were from cocker spaniels.
6 posted on
06/04/2023 7:07:02 AM PDT by
GMThrust
To: ProtectOurFreedom
No mention of breeds.They're afraid to mention breeds because they know it will come back to bite them...
7 posted on
06/04/2023 7:07:23 AM PDT by
RoosterRedux
(See my FR homepage for a link to the entire Bible narrated by David Suchet on youtube. FREE!)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
No mention of breeds. No mention of dog breeds or owner breeds. Or demographics of owners.
Also, the numbers would be a lot more relevant if expressed as per unit of populations. i.e. number of bites per 10,000 residents and XX postal carriers. Otherwise, not worth much. As is most of this drivel written by semi literate HS graduates.
26 posted on
06/04/2023 7:40:12 AM PDT by
ChildOfThe60s
( If you can remember the 60s.....you weren't really there..)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
I wonder where the scary golden retriever comes in on this list.
29 posted on
06/04/2023 7:44:48 AM PDT by
SamAdams76
(5,301,904 Truth | 86,921,174 Twitter)
To: ProtectOurFreedom
“No mention of breeds.”
Of dog owners or dogs?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson