Exactly. Medical studies, once respected and trusted, are now suspect, depending upon the funding source. Look what happened with all of the fake studies "proving" ivermectin and HCQ were either dangerous or useless against the Chinese virus. Many were later retracted (after the damage was done).
A new review from Schiffman and Rother1 on biological issues related to sucralose is an opinion piece that reiterates past opinions expressed by Schiffman that have been previously refuted by experts in safety assessment. The publication represents no additional research and does not consider the vast evidence on sucralose which concludes that it is safe and can also be an effective tool in weight and diabetes management in humans.
Schiffman previously wrote a low-fat/high carb cookbook for the Nutrisystem diet, and has been a one-woman Cassandra against sucralose for a long time. While sucralose has problems, all the current sweetener alternatives are demonstrably worse by a long shot.