Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: skeeter

You cannot have a true free-speech platform, because it will be overrun with people trying to ruin it by posting neo-Nazi crap and all kinds of other stuff. There has to be some level of moderation.


8 posted on 06/01/2023 6:46:44 AM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 6 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

I guess I mean free speech under the terms Musk has stated.

Although in a free state anyone should be able to state any kind of opinion, barring lewd or profane speech, threats of violence or pornography.


11 posted on 06/01/2023 6:50:10 AM PDT by skeeter
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

Not in a free speech society. Hell you can buy nazi stuff all over the internet. Do you plan to censor capitalism also.


14 posted on 06/01/2023 7:00:10 AM PDT by Harpotoo (Being a socialist is a lot easier than having to WORK like the rest of US:-))
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator
--- "You cannot have a true free-speech platform, because it will be overrun with people trying to ruin it by posting neo-Nazi crap and all kinds of other stuff. There has to be some level of moderation."

That is a fascinating assertion, but an assertion nonetheless. Whether neo-Nazi (which still is National Socialism but somehow "new") to neo-colonialist or whatever, once the Overton window's curtain is closed in to suppress, the only remaining question is "by how much?"

A line or two of code can accomplish this, but as we all have seen, someone can spell using alternative gaming of the system, such as sh"t or the use of spaces such as sh it, to bypass until the gaming is spotted and "line of code" is amended.

It comes down to a purist's argument. How much "free" is there in "free speech."

The answer might lie elsewhere, as these often very unsocial media entities be regulated by legal publisher status, and then have to defend their "publishing."

As to "free speech," I have been named as among the "morons" here on Free Republic, not to mention other fine assertions. I think one is free to write freely.

Until one is not. The remaining question is always how "not" is acceptable in a free society.

15 posted on 06/01/2023 7:01:29 AM PDT by Worldtraveler once upon a time (Degrow government)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

Hmmm...not sure I agree. I think there are less neo-Nazis in the world than we are lead to believe. Now if you said it would be over run with Muslims making death threats, I agree that it would. (as is the case for facebook). Still not sure there should be moderation. Unless the moderation is delegated downwards. Sorry I don’t use Twitter so I have little idea how it works. But I think it would be a good compromise if there are local moderators for specific pages on twitter. NOT from above.


58 posted on 06/01/2023 11:37:10 AM PDT by Sam Gamgee
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

To: dfwgator

“You cannot have a true free-speech platform, because it will be overrun with people trying to ruin it by posting neo-Nazi crap and all kinds of other stuff. There has to be some level of moderation.”

I thought that was what the blocking feature is for?


68 posted on 06/01/2023 9:00:33 PM PDT by TheElectionWasStolen
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson