[BlackbirdSST]

Nice try. But, back at you: You neocom(munists) assume facts not in evidence, jump to conclusions, and rush to judgment. See how that works?

I see how it works perfectly. I see you twisting words in an attempt at denying your defending of Graham. Why wouldn't you? Two peas in a pod. You can't separate yourself from your neocon allies no matter how many times you try to convince here that you're just another dog on the internet. I've seen enough of your postings to know better. Carry on.

[ought-six]

“I see how it works perfectly. I see you twisting words in an attempt at denying your defending of Graham.”

Nice try, kid. I merely pointed out that the clip was altered to show something that wasn’t. Such creative editing is the stuff of propagandists and liars: That you take umbrage that I point that out suggests that you agree with the agitprop; or else why are you defending it? Because, whether you know it or not, that is exactly what you are doing.

“You can’t separate yourself from your neocon allies no matter how many times you try to convince here that you’re just another dog on the internet. I’ve seen enough of your postings to know better.”

Then your reading comprehension is as weak as your grasp of logic.