Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: SunkenCiv

The article states “45 miles”.

Whoa. Even the Tohoku event traveled a fraction of that distance.

Bump for later (taking a quick lunchbreak).


7 posted on 05/29/2023 12:42:44 PM PDT by logi_cal869 (-cynicus the "concern troll" a/o 10/03/2018 /!i!! &@$%&*(@ -)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: logi_cal869; irishjuggler; rdl6989; dfwgator
In Roman times it was only 25 miles. In the late 1950s, a chunk of glacier slid into a river, and due to the geography (the river estuary is basically a fjord) the wave went inland and upward, leaving a debris line a half-mile above sealevel. And that was just a little booboo compared with most underwater landslides, the source of most tsunamis.

14 posted on 05/29/2023 1:02:04 PM PDT by SunkenCiv (NeverTrumpin' -- it's not just for DNC shills anymore -- oh, wait, yeah it is.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

To: logi_cal869

very big tsunami and very low flat land, yes it could go that far. A hundred foot rogue wave has still a limited amount of water in it and does not wash in very far. A fifty foot tsunami has the whole ocean behind it.


22 posted on 05/30/2023 6:21:18 AM PDT by ThanhPhero
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson