Past case had graffiti artists suing the owner of the building for destroying their “art”, and winning
https://nypost.com/2018/02/12/developer-must-pay-6-7m-for-destroying-iconic-graffiti-art/amp/
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Visual_Artists_Rights_Act
This is a joke right? What in hell. They paint on the place then they have ‘property’ rights over it? Do they have any responsibility for property taxes, upkeep, etc? Do they have a lien on the property that must be cleared before it can be sold?