Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: 9YearLurker

If he did renounce it, it would have been done because of British law. But say he didn’t have to. Let’s, for the sake of the arguement, say he became a Canadian Prime Minister. Under Canada’s law, you can be a dual-citizen and run for Prime Minister, as long as one of those citizenships is Canadian.

Could somebody born in the US, who remains a US citizen but becomes a dual citizen and becomes Prime Minister of Canada run as President if he then gives up his dual citizenship and becomes fully American?

I understand that shouldn’t happen, as intended by the Founding Fathers, but it’s the reality today.


8 posted on 05/23/2023 2:32:39 AM PDT by Jonty30 (If liberals were truth tellers, they'd call themselves literals. )
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 7 | View Replies ]


To: Jonty30

IIRC Johnson claimed to be renouncing his citizenship because of tax issues. Under US law a person’s *worldwide* income is subject to taxation by the IRS. Very few,if any,other countries have such a policy.


22 posted on 05/23/2023 4:40:58 AM PDT by Gay State Conservative (Two Words: BANANA REPUBLIC!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 8 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson