Im confused with his logic. Only the “born” can be triggered.
Yet the born are triggered by those being born.
So only the opposite, being “unborn” can be triggered by the “born”.
Thus the “born” can be triggered by “unborn”
So the logical conclusion is the born are triggered by what they supported, abortion.
Therefore the left must protest themselves.
The fourth word in, “logic”, is out of place.
“Feels” would be in place. Using feels eliminates confusion about the actually pro-baby killing being triggered by the pro-life.
To be pro-life in the mind of the pro-baby killing can essentially constitute an accusation that the pro-baby killing are for murder ... which they are.
To be reminded that they are for murder is probably unsettling given how people in general judge themselves in relation to others and seem to assume that they are “good people” who aren’t the bad people, like Nazis.
So the visceral reaction comes from the implicit accusation against what they feel, and any implied or imagined assault on their feels is an assault on them personally as being the good people.
Or, put another way, the world may sometimes resent salt and light.