Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: whitney69
When an underage youth goes into a riot area, with a firearm, and is responsible for the killing of two people and the wounding of another as he pulled the trigger on all three, and totally walks, why do we have laws?

When an irrelevantly aged citizen can't respond to a request from a tax-paying property owner to guard his livelihood with the instrumentation needed to enjoy his right to self-defense, why do we have a Second Amendment?

The two people he killed were unarmed.

One was armed with a skateboard, with which he had been beating people (Antifa regularly get away with beating people with skateboards just as effectively as could with baseball bats). In fact, he had been beating Rittenhouse and trying to acquire his firearm. The other, who had actually been ordered by his Antifa handler to go kill Rittenhouse, was also shot while attempting to arm himself with Kyle's gun. Since you don't like the idea of people in "riot areas" being armed, you'll be relieved to learn that they were thwarted. Both of these people had violent criminal records, and one was a registered sex offender. Good thing Kyle kept them from getting a gun.

Gaige Grosskreutz, who didn't die, was armed with a pistol, and all witness testimony (even his own) confirms that he was menacing Rittenhouse with it.

36 posted on 05/21/2023 8:58:20 AM PDT by Brass Lamp
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 24 | View Replies ]


To: Brass Lamp

Nice reply to an idiot.


39 posted on 05/21/2023 9:26:09 AM PDT by US_MilitaryRules (#PureBlood)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 36 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson