Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: ganeemead
Again I am not able to believe that [...]

Good that you begin your explanation with a frank admission of your severe intellectual limitations.

The explosion was conventional. Over the centuries, there have been multiple accidental chemical explosions on U.S. soil that were much bigger.

The DU tank gun ammo being stored at the depot found some way to explode in a nuclear fashion.

Ludicrous! Frankly impossible! You obviously have ZERO understanding of nuclear physics.

NATO fops and/or neocon wankers [...]

Pure speculation on your part.

Regards,

4 posted on 05/17/2023 10:04:00 PM PDT by alexander_busek (Extraordinary claims require extraordinary evidence.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies ]


To: alexander_busek

The loss of the USS Mount Hood in WW2 is a good example of the possibilities of conventional explosives.


20 posted on 05/18/2023 6:19:11 AM PDT by revetment
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 4 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson