Ad hominem tangential argument that shows a low IQ and inability to discuss civilly the question at hand.
Those types of tactics by right-center/Conservatives is not different than used by the Far-left/secular progressives.
Rather than debate the subject, attack the person.
Ronald Reagan in his day sat down with Tip O’Neil, the MA Dem and speaker of the House at breakfast every morning and discussed agenda items. They did not always agree and never attacked the person, but debated agenda items on the merit.
While this has been totally lost in the far left, it seems it is becoming more and more lost on the Right in general and here at Free Republic
Your bleeding heart humanitarian arguments are typical of the leftist couch potatoes sitting here in the United States who have no idea of the realities of life in Australia and their current battles against feral cats, wild dogs and the infestation of cane toads..........
Educate yourself before you post your bleeding heart nonsense........Sheesh!
Ad hominem tangential argument that shows a low IQ and inability to discuss civilly the question at hand.
= = =
I guess you mean me.
OKaaa (may be mispellled).