Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: TheThirdRuffian
The followers of Brand, however, were deeply insulted by Ulrichs’ theory. They perceived themselves not merely as masculine, but as a breed of men superior in masculine qualities even to heterosexuals.

That pretty much described Ernst Rohm.

46 posted on 05/17/2023 12:09:32 PM PDT by dfwgator (Endut! Hoch Hech!)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 45 | View Replies ]


To: dfwgator

“That pretty much described Ernst Rohm.”

Yes, indeed.

Rohm was Hitler’s right hand man, and very, very homosexual.

The “persecution of homosexuals” by Nazis is partially a myth. They persecuted (and raped and murdered) effeminate homosexuals, in no less a horrid fashion than they did Jews.

Like in Islam, “manly” homosexuals, however, were fine, and, indeed, very much considered admirable.

Homosexual rape was very much a feature of the concentration camps, and the SS was rot through with homosexual predators.


48 posted on 05/17/2023 12:29:12 PM PDT by TheThirdRuffian (Orange is the new brown)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 46 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson