[Labyrinthos]

In normal circumstances we should not simply jump to a conclusion, but on the other hand, if hyping these cases draws attention to the issue, and makes people look closer at the possibility these vaccines (experimental gene therapies) are causing injury and death, is this not a better result than allowing people to remain oblivious to the danger?

I can easily transform your statement into a mantra for the climate change kooks: In normal circumstances we should not simply jump to a conclusion, but on the other hand, if hyping climate events (heat, cold, floods, drought, tornados, hurricanes, etc.) draws attention to the issue, and makes people look closer at the possibility that man-made actives (use of fossil fuels, consuming meat products, opposing abortion on demand) are causing injury and death to the environment, is this not a better result than allowing people to remain oblivious to the danger?

[DiogenesLamp]

I can easily transform your statement into a mantra for the climate change kooks:

Yes you can, and what is happening with them? They are moving the world. Agency and authority one right after the other are going along with their bullsh*t.

is this not a better result than allowing people to remain oblivious to the danger?

Except the evidence demonstrates their danger is made up. Go to "Watts Up With That" and you can overwhelm yourself with proof that everything they claim is bullsh*t.

This vax stuff on the other hand does seem to be showing some correlations. It's too early to decide that there is or is not any danger. Best to be cautious at this point.