To: ChicagoConservative27
Isn’t 14 way too old for “hide and seek”?
She was prowling, more likely. Maybe looking for unattended items to steal.
4 posted on
05/09/2023 9:26:15 AM PDT by
BenLurkin
(The above is not a statement of fact. It is either opinion, or satire, or both.)
To: BenLurkin
You have no idea what you’re talking about. But that won’t stop you from spewing out whatever comes to mind.
9 posted on
05/09/2023 9:28:53 AM PDT by
subterfuge
(I'm a pure-blood!)
To: BenLurkin
It was a secluded cul de sac. Three houses... the shooters house, the victims house, and a victims relatives house.
You’re an idiot. (just getting that out there)
To: BenLurkin
Isn’t 14 way too old for “hide and seek”? No.
19 posted on
05/09/2023 9:59:27 AM PDT by
metmom
(...fixing our eyes on Jesus, the Author and Perfecter of our faith….)
To: BenLurkin
That’s ridiculous. Normal teens, not the nerds who stay indoors glued to their devices, do still play hide’n seek and other outdoor games.
Man, you are losing it.
37 posted on
05/09/2023 11:54:25 AM PDT by
miserare
( "Equity" is the new word for Communism.)
To: BenLurkin
Isn’t 14 way too old for “hide and seek”?7th or 8th grade? No.
42 posted on
05/09/2023 12:23:44 PM PDT by
gitmo
(If your theology doesn’t become your biography, what good is it?)
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson