Well. Thanks for the anecdotes but this actual data with the actual story demonstrate then that those people with the anecdotal data were going to get well regardless and that the IVM and HCQ are a non-factor.
And as you continue to persist on the same topic Terat was advised to delay actual curative therapy to get IVM. Which now according to this study demonstrate its uselessness. But you would have to recall the arguments that were made instead of the pivots attempted here. The reason why some have become the paragon of this is what they always knew if because they have no foundational knowledge so whatever is said sounds good. But in that ignorance people forget what they argued.
This study is particularly harmful and confirms the studies that fall on the side of IVM and HCq being reasonable drugs based on the mechanisms discovered.
Funny. This is what real science looks like. Non predetermined explanations to results that are well designed and researched.
| In the General/Chat forum, on a thread titled What really killed COVID-19 patients: It wasn't a cytokine storm, suggests study (Secondary bacterial pneumonia from ventilators), gas_dr wrote: |
Well. Thanks for the anecdotes but this actual data with the actual story demonstrate then that those people with the anecdotal data were going to get well regardless and that the IVM and HCQ are a non-factor. And as you continue to persist on the same topic Terat was advised to delay actual curative therapy to get IVM. Which now according to this study demonstrate its uselessness. But you would have to recall the arguments that were made instead of the pivots attempted here. The reason why some have become the paragon of this is what they always knew if because they have no foundational knowledge so whatever is said sounds good. But in that ignorance people forget what they argued. This study is particularly harmful and confirms the studies that fall on the side of IVM and HCq being reasonable drugs based on the mechanisms discovered. Funny. This is what real science looks like. Non predetermined explanations to results that are well designed and researched. |
This is how those pushing the Covid 'narrative' are dealing with the exposure of their lies:
" ....the actual story demonstrate then that those people with the anecdotal data were going to get well regardless and that the IVM and HCQ are a non-factor."
You know that's not true! You flat out lie to prop up the narrative.
Terart was offered zero treatment from her doctors, so she was not asked to delay actual curative therapy to get more IVM. While pretending to be a doctor, you failed to factor in her blood ox so you sent her for monoclonal infusions, while urging her NOT to take ivermectin.She tracked those infusions down but was not eligible because of her low blood ox. A real doctor would ask her to test her own blood ox before putting her remaining energy into seeking treatment she would be denied. A real doctor would discuss alternatives and options.
This study confirms what I and others were saying - don't trust the doctors, they are blindly following a dangerous protocol controlled by the CDC.
They study you are distorting does not demonstrate that IVM is useless. Your distortion of the truth continues to put FReepers at a disadvantage. Shame on you.