Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

Skip to comments.

Longtermism:„An odd and peculiar ideology“
netzpolitik.org ^ | 30.04.2023 | Esther Menhard

Posted on 04/30/2023 8:43:38 PM PDT by Krosan

Émile P. Torres calls one of the most influential philosophies of our time an ideology: Longtermism is the central school of thought of tech giants like Elon Musk and Skype founder Jaan Tallinn. In an interview, Torres explains why it is so dangerous.

Elon Musk has made headlines in recent months for his role as head of Twitter, which has seen him fundamentally transform the platform. What is less well known is that he is spending money to fund organizations whose mission is to fight artificial intelligence, which is supposedly threatening humanity.

The Future of Life Institute is also being advised by Musk. In the media, the institute caused a stir with an open letter warning of the destructive power of a possible superintelligence and calling for a pause in the development of new AI models.

Another organization that enjoyed funding from Musk is the Future of Humanity Institute. This is an interdisciplinary research center at Oxford University. Its director is the influential Swedish philosopher Nick Bostrom. He is a leading proponent of longtermism, a variety of effective altruism (EA). Both schools of thought call for research to be concentrated where it can have the greatest long-term positive impact on humanity.

An inhumane ideology

What may sound plausible at first, however, is the source of massive criticism. Émile P. Torres, currently a PhD candidate at Leibniz University Hanover and active on Twitter as @xriskology, explains the ideology behind effective altruism and longtermism in this interview.

(Excerpt) Read more at netzpolitik.org ...


TOPICS: Miscellaneous; Society; Weird Stuff
KEYWORDS:
Reminds me of the thinking in Asimov's Foundation novels or Communism dictatorships. Everything is justified because of the inevitable bright future.
1 posted on 04/30/2023 8:43:38 PM PDT by Krosan
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | View Replies]

To: Krosan

Maybe, but both stock-driven quarterly-results planning and soviet-style 5-year rigid plans have not gotten us anywhere.

The results are so bad companies have let their DIE (oops, DEI) divisions take over and implement “this is terrible for the consumer, the business, the shareholder and everyone, but FU” planning.


2 posted on 04/30/2023 9:09:51 PM PDT by No.6
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 1 | View Replies]

Disclaimer: Opinions posted on Free Republic are those of the individual posters and do not necessarily represent the opinion of Free Republic or its management. All materials posted herein are protected by copyright law and the exemption for fair use of copyrighted works.

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson