VAERS reports may contain information that is incomplete, inaccurate, coincidental, or unverifiable. Reports to VAERS can also be biased. As a result, there are limitations on how the data can be used scientifically. Data from VAERS reports should always be interpreted with these limitations in mind.”
The above are directly taken and in bold text on the VAERs website. I know the truth is loathsome to you but it literally tells you what VAERs is and acknowledge that the reports may be inaccurate and are unverifiable. Almost as if people with an agenda could skew this database.
People who actually know about data understand methodology and limitations are important. It is what is referred to as the scientific method. You literally cannot get past the statement from VAERs with your arguments intact inlets you are intentionally dishonest or incredibly dense. Though I will admit that in certain cases those are not mutually exclusive states. Yell and rant and rave all that want but you cannot get around the plain statement of the database upon which you base your arguments.
VAERS is quite obviously a safety signal. The Covid ‘vaccine’ data in VAERS signaled a magnificent array of safety issues with that experimental failed technology. Everyday, more information is coming out about vaccine harm and there you are, implying it’s all just personal bias and hidden agendas. Strap in and hang on - the vaccine harm tsunami is coming, VAERS is just showing the tip of the iceberg.