Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article

To: JoSixChip

Jo...and others. A single engine system is mathematically less prone to a failure incident than is an airplane with 3 engines. 3 engines = 3 opportunities for a failure incident.

Obviously, if the single engine fails, I am hosed. 2 or 3 engines allow for continued flight, assuming airworthiness can be maintained.


66 posted on 04/20/2023 9:24:26 AM PDT by citizen (Put all LBQTwhatever programming on a new subscription service: PERV-TV)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 59 | View Replies ]


To: citizen
A single engine system is mathematically less prone to a failure

The thing you are missing is that all engines can fail, but two engines failing at the same time is exponentially less likely then one. You can still fly with only one engine. It's called redundancy and it is the main reason they developed multiple engine planes in the first place.
68 posted on 04/20/2023 9:30:12 AM PDT by JoSixChip (2020: The year of unreported truths; 2021: My main take away from this year? Trust no one.)
[ Post Reply | Private Reply | To 66 | View Replies ]

Free Republic
Browse · Search
General/Chat
Topics · Post Article


FreeRepublic, LLC, PO BOX 9771, FRESNO, CA 93794
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson