Of course not.
But the government can "mandate" the shots. And the mRNA shot won't kill more than 0.2% of their herds. That will get lost in the noise levels. The casualties can be rendered for pet food, or livestock food.
Best case for the pharma companies is that the routine use of mRNA treatments will result in new and lethal viral strains which require continuous anti-viral treatments to protect herds. Sort of like what happens now with poultry flocks. See Mareks disease for a worked example.
A public that has become very anxious about rising "All-cause mortality rates" will be easy marks for the next round of anti-meat propaganda. "Studies show" and so forth.
The goal is an obedient, submissive peasantry, ruled by a permanent aristocracy with unchecked power over their slaves.
That peasantry cannot be allowed to possess weapons of any kind and should be strict vegetarians in order to minimize potential for aggression.
The aristocracy can eat whatever they want and kill whichever peasants offend them for any reason.
We have seen this movie before.
A public that has become very anxious about rising “All-cause mortality rates” will be easy marks for the next round of anti-meat propaganda. “Studies show” and so forth.
- - - - - - -
That’s the most important effect of any treatment or intervention.
People don’t understand that. They aren’t anxious about it and it hasn’t crossed their minds. If they understood it, they wouldn’t buy statins or get radiation treatment for cancer. Radiation doesn’t make people with breast cancer live longer.
Having a lot of stored iron is harmful. Men who eat chocolate or meat consume more iron than they need. I can prove that to 18-year-olds. Donating blood every two years prevents excess iron.
If a person finds it interesting, he can start by doing an internet search for ferritin triglycerides, to know the relationship between them.