This is precisely the kind of falsehood offered by the global warming crowd. My article in BizPacReview begs to disagree:
“’The oft-repeated claim that nearly all scientists demand that something dramatic be done to stop global warming is not true,’ a group of distinguished scientists revealed in the Wall Street Journal. They cite the Global Warming Petition Project, in which 31,000 scientists conclude that ‘there is no convincing scientific evidence that human release of carbon dioxide, methane, or other greenhouse gases is causing or will, in the foreseeable future, cause catastrophic heating of the Earth’s atmosphere and disruption of the Earth’s climate.’”
Bear in mind that I have been doing my own research on this subject for years. My conclusion: It cannot be claimed beyond a reasonable doubt that (a) global warming exists, or that (b) climate change is caused by human activities, or that (c) climate change is dangerous. So who or what gives ChatGPT the right to attack my position with misinformation?
Programmed by fellas with compassion and vision.
The woke developers call their blatant censorship “guard rails.”
According to a conversation I had with it this morning, it is ok to sue a cake maker for not baking a cake for a gay wedding because that is discrimination, but you can’t sue Jimmy Kimmel for refusing to write a comedy sketch critical of Hillary Clinton because that is artistic freedom.
GIGO: Garbage in, garbage out.
Kirk:
M-5, I mean ChatGPT, sea levels are at unprecedentedly high levels.
Landru, I mean ChatGPT, global warming is real and is warming the planet hotter than ever.
Nomad, I mean ChatGPT, global warming causes sea levels to rise.
Norman, I mean ChatGPT, the historic record shows sea levels where higher in the past few thousand years.
Rayna, I mean ChatGPT, global warming causes blizzards.
ChatGPT, global warming is real! It's hotter than ever that's why it snows more! Sea levels are higher than ever, but not as high as they were a thousand years ago! Global warming is real!
““trained on a massive amount of text data from the internet””
I think I see the problem.
Woke just like its programmers!
From a pratical standpoint, this Chat AI is little different from the woke algorithyms used by the google search engine to return liberal reults and supress all others.
just what we need... a nazi AI
It’s not a chatbot it’s a Libtardbot.
It regurgitates the phony libtard dogma that it was programmed with
Like a Dumbbot
P
So is Wikipedia. Something happened on August 26th... not mentioned on this timeline. Gee, what could it have been?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_history_(2010%E2%80%93present)
I don’t do HTML, so cut and paste...
Behavior of the bot comes down to the weighting factors initially installed or added post-install, and allowed or disallowed. Human curators are ALWAYS involved. Expose the CURATORS!!
Just a new buzzword. Same garbage in and garbage out.
It will mean many people in “journalism” will lose their jobs.