If they are anonymous, how do we know they are “pro-Russian”?
AP claims such anonymous accounts parrot Russians, meaning (only) they’re very similar. A lot would hinge on why they’re similar. For the AP to suggest something nefarious, similarity of message doesn’t cut it.
Disparate voices from opposite sides of the world may well mundanely have seen the same obvious characteristics in an event—all without either voice doing the bidding of someone else.
Does the AP have evidence of money changing hands to abet an enemy as we have with the CCP-Biden payoffs?