To: nickcarraway
Hmmmm——unless she was a stockholder, I thought all depositors were going to be reimbursed?
2 posted on
03/17/2023 3:16:36 PM PDT by
john drake
(Lucius Accius-Roman,170 BC - "oderint dum metuant" translated "Let them hate so long as they fear")
To: john drake
"I thought all depositors were going to be reimbursed?"
Well, she is an actress after all...
5 posted on
03/17/2023 3:18:56 PM PDT by
Dogbert41
To: john drake
Up to the FDIC’s $250k limit.
7 posted on
03/17/2023 3:25:18 PM PDT by
Carriage Hill
(A society grows great when old men plant trees, in whose shade they know they will never sit.)
To: john drake
Depositors are getting 100% of their money back. She is either stupid and doesn’t realize that or she was a shareholder of the bank?
To: john drake
What a waste!
Not what she lost, what she gets back.
19 posted on
03/17/2023 3:51:19 PM PDT by
farmguy
To: john drake
“Hmmmm——unless she was a stockholder, I thought all depositors were going to be reimbursed?”
Maybe she was a conservative depositor?
20 posted on
03/17/2023 3:51:32 PM PDT by
BobL
To: john drake
You are right of course, she will not lose any money unless she is taking about investing in their stock. But isn’t it fun to play the victim?
FreeRepublic.com is powered by software copyright 2000-2008 John Robinson