[StAnDeliver]

Here is the problem, explained another way. PCMag has no business whatsoever 'reporting' on what is actually a Ziff-Davis attack on the RCC, thinly masquerading as a geo-fencing article, when other Ziff-Davis publishing properties have excoriated Dinesh for using publically-available geo-fencing data in the exact same way in "2000 Mules".

Why? Because "2000 Mules" attacked Democrats!

Just to prove my point completely, here is PCMag.com sister publication Mashable, raving about LQBLTXYLOP candidates succeeding in the 2020 general election:

"The Rainbow Wave is real. A record number of LGBTQ candidates were running for office at the local, state, and federal levels this year, with political action committee Victory Fund recording a, well, record-breaking 1000-plus(Opens in a new tab) candidates from the community. And at least seven states have significant firsts thanks to wins by LGBTQ candidates:"

[GaryCrow]

If you read the article PCMag is attacking the organization, Catholic Laity and Clergy for Renewal, for mining the data on gay priests and the tech firms that sold them the data. They're indignant that this group was able to figure out who these gay priests are.

Many years of ignoring the growing homosexual cancer inside the priesthood are what led to the pedophilia scandals that have harmed the Church so much. The media tries to paint it as if pedophilia has nothing to do with gay priests but ask yourself, how many girls have you heard of being molested? The victims were overwhelmingly boys but the media likes to leave that inconvenient point out.

I don't know what has to be done to fix it, but at least this group is trying to do something to root out the sodomites and expose them. That needed to be done a long time ago. Nothing good is going to come from allowing the priesthood to become a refuge for homosexuals.